![]() In an attempt to have busing services reinstated to and from his home, Watts then contacted the school district, appeared before the school board and wrote to the school district solicitor. The district informed Watts that it would no longer transport CW to and from his home for the 2012-2013 school year, only from the mother’s home because that was the primary address the school had on file.Īccording to court documents, CW’s middle school had a bus route that serves Watts’ neighborhood. Before the start of the following school year, the school board decided to reduce transportation costs by no longer transporting students to and from multiple locations, a decision that affected approximately 400 students but also saved approximately $200,000 annually. Prior to the 2011-2012 school year, the school district provided transportation to and from multiple locations to particular students, including those with parents who are separated. The two parents live within two miles of each other, both within the Manheim Central School District but along different bus routes. Watts, the parent of “CW,” a student at Manheim Township Middle School, shares equally divided legal and physical custody of the child by court order with the child’s mother, his ex-wife. ![]() ![]() Manheim Central School District, Timothy L. ![]() The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld a ruling from the Commonwealth Court that stated that school districts must transport students to and from the respective homes of each parent if they are separated and sharing custody. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |